When do you need a solar attorney?
You need a solar attorney when something specific went wrong that your documents can show: a sales promise the contract contradicts, a signature you never made, a loan disclosure that left out a cost, or an installer whose conduct your loan’s terms let you raise against the lender. A system that disappointed you, or savings smaller than you hoped, is a reason to look at your options, though it is usually not a lawsuit by itself.
Disclosure: Candid Yak works with Titan Advocacy Group, a solar consumer advocacy firm, and may be paid when readers hire it.
There are two ways to get a lawyer on your file. An attorney-backed firm that offers a free case review can retain one for you if it accepts your case, or you can hire your own. Either way, the lawyer can only work with what you bring, so your documents and your dates matter most.
What does a claim worth a lawyer look like?
| Claim | What it needs | The rule behind it |
|---|---|---|
| Documented misrepresentation | A specific false statement of fact, and a document or witness that shows it | State deceptive practices laws |
| Forged or unauthorized signature | Evidence you didn’t sign, or didn’t mean to | The federal E-SIGN Act and state law |
| Truth in Lending disclosure failure | A loan disclosure that misstated or left out a cost | The Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z |
| Holder Rule claim | A seller-arranged loan with the Holder notice, plus a claim against the seller | 16 CFR Part 433, with a cap on recovery |
| Refused cancellation | A timely written notice the seller ignored | 16 CFR Part 429 and state law |
Documented misrepresentation
The claim needs a statement of fact, such as the price, the payment, who gets the tax credit or what the system would produce, and proof of it. The enforcement record shows what that looks like. Michigan’s attorney general alleges that Climax Solar’s representatives promised homeowners they could “replace or greatly reduce their utility bills with affordable solar payments” and use federal tax credits to lower the cost; motions to dismiss are pending. The CFPB found that “some installers misrepresent the future cost of energy and overestimate the amount of electricity that solar panels will produce.” A proposal, a text or a savings worksheet showing the promise is the raw material. The dispute guide shows how to line it up against the contract.
Forged or unauthorized signatures
Under the E-SIGN Act, an electronic signature must be “executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record.” New York’s attorney general alleges that Attyx salespeople pushed consumers to sign electronically, “often without their knowledge,” in a pending case. These claims turn on facts and on whom you sue. In Migliore v. Vision Solar (3d Cir. 2025, precedential), a homeowner’s claims against the company that arranged her loan and the bank that made it failed, in part because “She has not plausibly alleged the salesman was their agent,” and the court noted she might have had claims against the salesman’s company “But she abandoned them.” That ruling binds only the Third Circuit. If a signature isn’t yours, get a lawyer involved early and see the forged signature guide.
Truth in Lending disclosure failures, where TILA applies
Regulation Z calls these a loan’s material disclosures: “the annual percentage rate, the finance charge, the amount financed, the total of payments, the payment schedule” (12 CFR 1026.23(a)(3)(ii)). In August 2025, the federal judge handling the Dividend and Fifth Third solar loan cases refused to dismiss claims that an undisclosed “platform fee” was a finance charge, writing that it “appears to fit rather neatly into TILA’s definition of ‘finance charge.’” That was a ruling on the pleadings, and the claims are unproven. A TILA suit generally must be filed “within one year from the date of the occurrence of the violation,” and in a successful action the statute provides for “the costs of the action, together with a reasonable attorney’s fee as determined by the court” (15 U.S.C. 1640).
The right to rescind applies only when the loan takes a security interest in your principal dwelling, such as a home equity loan or HELOC. There, if the required notice or material disclosures were not delivered, the right “shall expire 3 years after consummation” or on an earlier sale or transfer. A typical solar loan secured only by the panels usually doesn’t carry it: Regulation Z excludes incidental interests in fixtures, and the 11th Circuit held, in a non-solar case, that a fixture security interest is not one in the home.
Holder Rule claims, with the cap
If the seller arranged your loan, look for the capitalized notice that any holder of the contract “IS SUBJECT TO ALL CLAIMS AND DEFENSES WHICH THE DEBTOR COULD ASSERT AGAINST THE SELLER.” The same notice limits what you recover: it “SHALL NOT EXCEED AMOUNTS PAID BY THE DEBTOR HEREUNDER.” The FTC said in 2022 that the rule “does not prevent state law from providing costs or attorneys’ fees against loan holders.” These claims can survive a lender’s bankruptcy: Mosaic’s 2025 confirmation order states that claims and defenses related to consumer credit claims against Solar Mosaic LLC, its financing partners and its securitization vehicles “are preserved.” No agency has applied the Holder Rule to leases or PPAs.
State deceptive practices laws that award attorney fees
The state attorney general cases against solar sellers and lenders in Minnesota, Michigan and New York rely in part on these laws, and some of them also let a winning consumer recover fees. Texas’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act says “Each consumer who prevails shall be awarded court costs and reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees,” generally requires written notice 60 days before a suit for damages, and allows two years from the act or its discovery. Michigan’s Consumer Protection Act allows “actual damages or $250.00, whichever is greater, together with reasonable attorney fees.” Your state’s law sets its own terms, so ask the lawyer which one applies.
A cancellation the seller ignored
If you sent a valid notice inside your window and the seller kept the money, the federal Cooling-Off Rule required a refund within 10 business days of your notice, where the rule applies. In Texas, the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation can also order a solar agreement cancelled and a refund, after a hearing and a finding of a violation (Occupations Code 1806.207).
What isn’t a claim on its own?
A bill that stayed high because rates rose, a cloudy season, or a system that underperforms without any promise to the contrary is an outcome you can raise with the company, though usually not a legal claim by itself. Installation problems also differ from sales claims: a leaking roof or a dead inverter is usually a warranty or performance question under the contract. Either can sit beside a real claim, and a good consultation separates them.
How does an attorney retained through a firm differ from your own?
| Attorney retained through a firm | Attorney you hire yourself | |
|---|---|---|
| Who pays the lawyer | The firm may, with your informed consent | You |
| What you pay | The firm’s fee, quoted in writing after review | The lawyer’s fee under your engagement letter |
| Typical scope | Negotiating a written modification, settlement, release or cancellation | Whatever your engagement covers, including arbitration or court |
| Who chooses the lawyer | The firm, for clients it accepts | You |
| Who the lawyer represents | You, under an engagement you sign directly | You |
The ABA’s Model Rule 1.8(f) lets a lawyer accept pay from someone other than the client only if “the client gives informed consent,” there is “no interference with the lawyer’s independence of professional judgment or with the client-lawyer relationship,” and client information stays confidential. The ABA calls its model rules advisory; your state’s version controls.
Ask either kind of lawyer the same questions:
- Does the engagement name me as the client, and who signs it?
- Who is paying you, and have I consented to that in writing?
- What is in scope, and does it include arbitration or court if negotiation fails?
- What is your honest read of my claim before I pay for more work?
How do you check a solar attorney’s license?
The American Bar Association says “Your state maintains current records of registration and discipline information for lawyers licensed to practice in the state,” and that lawyers are licensed by their state’s highest court, with “no national license to practice law.” Look up the individual lawyer, by name, with the regulator in your state, check for public discipline, and confirm admission in the state where you live and the system sits. The ABA adds that every state has a lawyers’ fund for client protection, which can reimburse clients for a lawyer’s dishonest conduct.
What does a solar attorney cost?
We don’t publish fee figures, because we found no source we would stand behind. Lawyers may bill hourly, take a retainer, or work on contingency; under the ABA’s model rule, a contingent fee agreement “shall be in a writing signed by the client” and must say which expenses you owe “whether or not the client is the prevailing party.” Fee-shifting laws like the ones above can move the cost to the other side if you win. If cost is the barrier, Treasury’s solar advisory says “Nonprofit legal services can help you stand up for your rights in cases of fraud, abuse, or deception,” pointing to lsc.gov and lawhelp.org.
What should you gather before you call?
Bring the signed contract and every addendum; the loan agreement with its Truth in Lending disclosure, or the lease or PPA; the proposal, ads, texts and emails; the e-signature records; payment records and utility bills; any written answer from the installer or lender; and complaint confirmations. Add a short timeline: the date of the pitch, the signing, installation, permission to operate, any cancellation notice, and any payment change. Nearly every claim above turns on those dates.
In what order should you bring in a lawyer?
- Inside a cancellation window? Cancel in writing now, by the method the contract and the law require, and send a copy to the lender the same day.
- Identify your contract and every company. Use your documents to find your contract type (cash, loan, lease, PPA, or PACE) and every company involved: the installer, the lender, the loan servicer and the warranty provider. They may be four different companies.
- Ask in writing, and complain for free. For a system you bought, the FTC says, “If you have a problem with a system you bought, try to resolve it with the company first,” then report it at ReportFraud.ftc.gov and to your state attorney general. The CFPB’s complaint page asks, “Have you tried reaching out to the company?” Treasury, the CFPB and the FTC “encourage consumers that believe they have been a victim of unfair or deceptive practices to file a complaint with CFPB, FTC, or their relevant state consumer protection office.” Add your state contractor licensing board.
- If they refuse, and your documents show a gap between what you were promised and what you signed, get a free case review from an attorney-backed firm, or consult your own lawyer.
- Other routes: a buyout for a lease or PPA, a payoff or refinance for a loan, or a transfer at sale. The main guide covers each.
Keep paying throughout, and don’t change a payment until a lawyer who has read your documents advises it. The stop-paying guide lists the consequences.
Disclosure: Candid Yak works with Titan Advocacy Group, a solar consumer advocacy firm, and may be paid when readers hire it. This page’s author, Kira Fairbank, is a manager at Vacation Ownership Consultants, a timeshare exit firm.
This is general information, not legal advice. Whether you have a claim turns on your documents, your dates and the law of your state, so take the file to an attorney licensed there before you send a demand, sign a release, or change any payment.
Sources
- AG Nessel Files Lawsuit Against Solar Company, Financial Institutions for Alleged Deceptive Scheme - Michigan Attorney General, July 15, 2026
- Complaint, Michigan v. Orbit Marketing LLC d/b/a Climax Solar et al., W.D. Mich. No. 1:26-cv-02084 - Michigan Attorney General, July 15, 2026
- Michigan v. Orbit Marketing LLC, No. 1:26-cv-02084, docket - CourtListener
- Solar Financing Market Issue Spotlight - Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, August 2024
- 15 U.S.C. 7006, E-SIGN Act definitions - Legal Information Institute
- Attorney General James Sues Home Solar Power Company and Lenders - New York Attorney General, March 17, 2026
- Complaint, People of the State of New York v. Attyx LLC et al. (General Business Law 349 and Executive Law 63(12) claims), N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York County - New York Attorney General, March 17, 2026
- Migliore v. Vision Solar LLC, No. 24-1679 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, November 21, 2025 (GovInfo)
- Migliore v. Vision Solar LLC, No. 24-1679 - Third Circuit opinion archive
- 12 CFR 1026.23, Right of rescission - eCFR, current October 2026
- 15 U.S.C. 1635, Right of rescission as to certain transactions - Legal Information Institute
- Regulation Z 1026.2, Definitions - Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
- Lankhorst v. Independent Savings Plan Co., No. 14-11449 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, May 29, 2015
- Order on Fifth Third Bank's First Motion to Dismiss, In re Dividend Solar Finance, LLC, and Fifth Third Bank Sales and Lending Practices Litigation, MDL No. 24-3128 (D. Minn.) - GovInfo, August 22, 2025
- In re Dividend Solar Finance, LLC, and Fifth Third Bank Sales and Lending Practices Litigation, 0:24-md-03128, docket - PacerMonitor
- 15 U.S.C. 1640, Civil liability - Legal Information Institute
- 16 CFR Part 433, Preservation of Consumers' Claims and Defenses - eCFR, current October 2026
- FTC Issues Advisory Opinion on the Holder Rule and Attorneys' Fees and Costs - FTC, January 20, 2022
- Commission Statement on the Holder Rule and Attorneys' Fees and Costs - FTC, January 18, 2022
- Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order Confirming Plan, In re Mosaic Sustainable Finance Corp., No. 25-90156, Docket No. 671 - U.S. Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Tex., September 5, 2025
- Attorney General Ellison sues solar lenders over $35M in deceptive hidden fees - Minnesota Attorney General, March 8, 2024
- Texas Business and Commerce Code Chapter 17, Deceptive Trade Practices - Texas Legislature
- MCL 445.911, Michigan Consumer Protection Act remedies - Michigan Legislature
- 16 CFR Part 429, Cooling-Off Rule - eCFR, current October 2026
- Texas Occupations Code Chapter 1806, Residential Solar Retailers - Texas Legislature
- Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.8: Current Clients, Specific Rules - American Bar Association
- Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.5: Fees - American Bar Association
- Consumer FAQs - American Bar Association Center for Professional Responsibility
- Consumer Advisory: Solar Energy Scams are Against the Law - U.S. Department of the Treasury, August 2024
- Before You Purchase and Finance Solar Panels - U.S. Department of the Treasury, August 2024
- Solar Power for Your Home - FTC Consumer Advice
- Submit a complaint - Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, October 2026
- Treasury, CFPB, and FTC Announce Steps to Protect Residential Solar Consumers (JY2522) - U.S. Department of the Treasury, August 7, 2024